AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
  • News
  • Emergency
  • Reports
  • Military
  • Space
  • LivestreamsACTIVE
  • Webcams
  • Store
    • My Account
    • Order tracking
    • AvGeek clothing
    • Models
    • Keychains
    • T-shirts
    • Toys
    • Boeing
    • Airbus
    • Hat
    • Space
4
  • × Airbus A350XWB Black Cap 1 × $34.90
  • × Boeing Black Cap 1 × $34.90
  • × Building bricks Supermarine Spitfire 1 × $29.90
  • × Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit keychain 1 × $5.90

Subtotal: $105.60

View cartCheckout

Notification Show More
AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
Search
  • News
  • Emergency
  • Reports
  • Military
  • Space
  • LivestreamsACTIVE
  • Webcams
  • Store
    • My Account
    • Order tracking
    • AvGeek clothing
    • Models
    • Keychains
    • T-shirts
    • Toys
    • Boeing
    • Airbus
    • Hat
    • Space
Follow US
AIRLIVE Aviation news network
Reports

REPORT An engineer forgot tape on a Qantas Boeing 787 which flew to Los Angeles

Last updated: May 21, 2022 10:13
Published 3 years ago Category: Reports Author: AIRLIVE
SHARE

A Boeing 787 being used for a freight flight flew from Melbourne to Los Angeles with tape over four of its static ports, a new ATSB investigation report details.

After the Qantas 787-9 aircraft, registered VH-ZNJ, landed in Los Angeles on the morning of 22 September 2021, a Qantas engineer found tape covering the four static ports on the aircraft’s engine fan cowls.

Static ports provide important air pressure data to aircraft systems. Boeing recommends they be covered, to avoid contamination, when the aircraft is parked for periods up to 7 days, and Qantas incorporated this instruction into its ‘normal’ parking procedure.

The ATSB investigation details that on the day before the incident flight, an engineer undertook the parking procedure on the aircraft, which included covering the engine cowl static ports with ‘remove before flight’ barricade streamer tape.

“Later that day, another engineer was tasked to conduct the ‘restore’ procedure to return the aircraft to flight status,” ATSB Director Transport Safety Stuart Macleod explained.

“The tape on the engine fan cowls was not removed by that engineer, as per the manufacturer’s procedures, and this wasn’t identified by flight crew or dispatch during pre-departure checks.”

VH-ZNJ subsequently took off with the tape still on its engine fan cowl static ports.

“While the flight was uneventful, the covered ports meant redundancy for the engine electronic control system was reduced,” Mr Macleod noted.

The ATSB found that while the job instruction card (JIC) developed by Qantas for parking a 787 did link to Boeing’s recommended procedures, the JIC for restoring it back to service did not.

“This was a missed opportunity to assist engineers to readily access the current procedures and determine which ports were covered, and also allowed for different interpretations of which ports could be covered,” Mr Macleod said.

“When performing safety‑critical tasks like aircraft maintenance, it is very important that procedures are clear and unambiguous to avoid misinterpretation and error such as occurred in this incident.”

At interview, the flight crew’s second officer, who conducted an exterior inspection of VH-ZNJ before the flight, reported they were aware of the fan cowl ports, but not that they could be covered by tape.

The second officer also reported they were somewhat distracted during the inspection, as they had found a pitot tube cover on the ground, and were trying to hand it off to an engineering staff member at that time.

“The second officer also believed Qantas engineering had conducted a pre-flight inspection prior to the flight crew arriving at the aircraft,” Mr Macleod added.

Following the occurrence, Qantas distributed memos to engineering, and flight and ramp crew, highlighting the location of the fan cowl static ports and that they may be covered.

In addition, the airline amended its ‘park’ and ‘restore’ engineering instructions to both reference Boeing’s procedures.

The investigation report also notes the metre-long tail of the ‘remove before flight’ tape covering the static ports was stuck down, to prevent it being torn from the fuselage in strong winds, as per Boeing’s recommended procedure.

“This likely reduced the visibility of it covering the fan cowl static port covers,” Mr Macleod said.

“Targeted inspection of locations and components, rather than relying on streamers, which can detach, can help to identify when these covers or devices have not been removed.”

Read the report: AO-2021-040 Aircraft flight preparation occurrence involving Boeing 787-9, VH‑ZNJ Melbourne Airport, Victoria on 22 September 2021

LATEST NEWS

Air Canada #AC50 from Montréal to New Delhi just diverted to Frankfurt
News 55 minutes ago Air Canada Boeing 787-9 AC AC50 C-FVLX FRA
British Airways flight is declaring an emergency inbound London Heathrow
Emergency 1 hour ago
LIVE Very strong cross wind reported at Rome FCO Airport
News 20 hours ago FCO
North runway at Vancouver International Airport likely to be closed for 48 hours
Emergency 1 day ago Prime Air Boeing 767-338ER freighter C-GAZI YVR
First Officer of ‘Miracle on the Hudson’ retires from American Airlines on flight from London to Chicago
News 2 days ago American Airlines AA AA87 ORD
British Airways and Iberia affected by IT issues tonight causing disruption to flights across Europe
News 2 days ago British Airways ba IB LHR

Related news

Reports

REPORT A Qantas A380 performed 34 flights with a tool left inside one of its engines

6 days ago
Reports

Passenger breaks his ankle during United pilots maneuver to avoid mid-air collision

2 months ago
Reports

ATSB report reveals an Air Traffic Controller has been found asleep on night shift at Brisbane Airport

3 months ago
Reports

REPORT How several windows of an Airbus A321 were damaged during a filming event at London Stansted

4 months ago

AIRLIVE.net is supported by a team of aviation enthusiasts.

All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. AIRLIVE.net makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions.

AIRLIVEAIRLIVE
Follow US
Copyright AIRLIVE
  • Contact
  • Submit a story
  • Cookie policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Return policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?